QPiepelr65
Ford Transit Connect
Ok so grounding has been tying me in knots mentally these past couple of weeks.
When I initially installed my basic 12v system with only a single 100ah battery from what I read online grounding to chasis was not essential due to the small loads.
I am speaking here only about for safety in malfunction cases, not the other idea of using chasis ground as the 'return' route of the negative. Although the former may also necessarily imply the latter that is not what I want to do it for but due to 'best practices' that people keep telling me of online.
The only issue I can think of might be the wire sizing but the size I have currently from starter to leisure is 110a rating and the leisure battery is only 105ah. The only questionable bit of wire will be from the starter battery to the chasis ground which looks maybe 16mm2 but might be thinner. Certainly rather worn and rusted. That would only take a load for a couple of seconds in case of a malfunction though wouldn't it? It is really awkward to get to that with other stuff I would have to remove to access it probably so don't fancy changing it if can be avoided. I can see about updating that but for now it is fine no? Any I may want to update that but the main question is whether just using that as ground alone for everything is fine from a theory (and practice) perspective.
Now up until now my leisure battery wasn't linked to the chasis at all and rather 'free floating' as I have seen it termed. No issues but would often get the comments of 'you should really ground to chasis' if it came up.
I have recently bought a dc-dc charger, sterling's bb1260. I was again told I really want to ground to chasis now more than ever due to the rather large amp that will be flowing through the wires.
Apart from a brief test, I have not connected it up properly yet.
Having read much more on the subject and received advice both on and offline I am wondering, if the starter battery will be linked to a negative busbar and all other leisure negatives are linked to that busbar, including the leisure battery, and given that the starter battery is ground to the chasis under the van hood, is there any point it making yet another chasis ground in the habitation space?
The dc-dc connection, as per the sterling instructions which expressly state to make a full wiring connection, and not use ground as negative, will be: starter positive to charger input positive, starter negative to negative busbar. Charger negative to negative busbar and charger positive out to leisure battery out. Also as stated all other habitation negatives to negative busbar.
So, as such, can I just forget about any more grounding to chasis since everything should be grounded to chasis via the starter battery's existing chasis ground right? No point making things more complicated than they are already right and the ford's own ground is going to be the best isn't it? Ok it isn't that clean which may be something to think about but still better to work with what I have already eh rather than reinvent the wheel?
Also another side question. When people discuss using the chasis as a negative return instead of a dedicated negative wire to complete the circuit how is than not a shock risk if current is flowing all through naked metal rather than insulated wire?
When I initially installed my basic 12v system with only a single 100ah battery from what I read online grounding to chasis was not essential due to the small loads.
I am speaking here only about for safety in malfunction cases, not the other idea of using chasis ground as the 'return' route of the negative. Although the former may also necessarily imply the latter that is not what I want to do it for but due to 'best practices' that people keep telling me of online.
The only issue I can think of might be the wire sizing but the size I have currently from starter to leisure is 110a rating and the leisure battery is only 105ah. The only questionable bit of wire will be from the starter battery to the chasis ground which looks maybe 16mm2 but might be thinner. Certainly rather worn and rusted. That would only take a load for a couple of seconds in case of a malfunction though wouldn't it? It is really awkward to get to that with other stuff I would have to remove to access it probably so don't fancy changing it if can be avoided. I can see about updating that but for now it is fine no? Any I may want to update that but the main question is whether just using that as ground alone for everything is fine from a theory (and practice) perspective.
Now up until now my leisure battery wasn't linked to the chasis at all and rather 'free floating' as I have seen it termed. No issues but would often get the comments of 'you should really ground to chasis' if it came up.
I have recently bought a dc-dc charger, sterling's bb1260. I was again told I really want to ground to chasis now more than ever due to the rather large amp that will be flowing through the wires.
Apart from a brief test, I have not connected it up properly yet.
Having read much more on the subject and received advice both on and offline I am wondering, if the starter battery will be linked to a negative busbar and all other leisure negatives are linked to that busbar, including the leisure battery, and given that the starter battery is ground to the chasis under the van hood, is there any point it making yet another chasis ground in the habitation space?
The dc-dc connection, as per the sterling instructions which expressly state to make a full wiring connection, and not use ground as negative, will be: starter positive to charger input positive, starter negative to negative busbar. Charger negative to negative busbar and charger positive out to leisure battery out. Also as stated all other habitation negatives to negative busbar.
So, as such, can I just forget about any more grounding to chasis since everything should be grounded to chasis via the starter battery's existing chasis ground right? No point making things more complicated than they are already right and the ford's own ground is going to be the best isn't it? Ok it isn't that clean which may be something to think about but still better to work with what I have already eh rather than reinvent the wheel?
Also another side question. When people discuss using the chasis as a negative return instead of a dedicated negative wire to complete the circuit how is than not a shock risk if current is flowing all through naked metal rather than insulated wire?
Last edited: