For Sale Staggered Alloys 20 inch £750

[T6 LYE]

Totally unmarked Staggered wheels, deep dish rears, 9/10j 920kg rated with Xl tyres, all near MAX tread, come with VW centre caps,bolt caps, spigots…. Perfect fit on Transporter, located Willenhall WV12… message me on 07xxx-xxxxxx

 

[Bav]

Please share contact details via DMs only.

 

[Greybeard]

In case anyone asks;
The front tyres appear to be load rated at 99?
This would equate to 775kg each or 1550kg per axle.
And from the VW T6 brochure;
That would limit T6s to T28 or T30 with 102ps engine and 5 speed gearbox.

I don’t have T6.1 info.

 

[Badjamin]

No price either...?

 

[T6 LYE]

Apologies folks, £750

 

[Mister-E]

I assume the Extra Load as it says on the tyre (ignoring the 99) is the same as XL, so should be rated ok? Are you looking for a sale only? Thinking of changing my nearly new Wolfrace Wolfsburg 18s with nearly new Bridgestone Potenza Sport tyres.

 

[T6 LYE]

Yes sale only

 

[Gsixty]

I assume the Extra Load as it says on the tyre (ignoring the 99) is the same as XL, so should be rated ok? Are you looking for a sale only? Thinking of changing my nearly new Wolfrace Wolfsburg 18s with nearly new Bridgestone Potenza Sport tyres.

No, not at all. Read post #3 above

 

[Greybeard]

I assume the Extra Load as it says on the tyre (ignoring the 99) is the same as XL, so should be rated ok? Are you looking for a sale only? Thinking of changing my nearly new Wolfrace Wolfsburg 18s with nearly new Bridgestone Potenza Sport tyres.

 

[Gsixty]

View attachment 269685

Its all a bit bizarre really. So according to the above an XL tyre can support a heavier vehicle than a standard "non-XL" tyre.

Implying a 101 XL tyre can support a heavier vehicle than a 101 non-XL. It pretty much makes the load rating gobbledegook. It would make more sens to get rid of the XL bit and call a 101 XL tyre a (for example) 102 tyre. Current system seems a bit stupid.

 

[Greybeard]

Its all a bit bizarre really. So according to the above an XL tyre can support a heavier vehicle than a standard "non-XL" tyre.

Implying a 101 XL tyre can support a heavier vehicle than a 101 non-XL. It pretty much makes the load rating gobbledegook. It would make more sens to get rid of the XL bit and call a 101 XL tyre a (for example) 102 tyre. Current system seems a bit stupid.

For a certain size 101 XL is higher than a normal (SL) tyre of the same size, which may only be eg 96-99.
The standard tyres for the standard wheels on our MINI Cooper S are
205/45R17 88W XL where W is the speed rating and marked XL as 88 is higher than the normal rating of a tyre that size. A Bridgestone Potenza S001 of the same size is available with an 84 load rating, which wouldn’t suit our MINI.

 

[Greybeard]

Perhaps XL is added to draw the attention of those not too familiar with the load rating tables vs kilos per wheel vs kilos per axle?