Methinks he is just stirring going by the tone of his posts here.
I don’t see it as being aimed at the OP personally but to be honest lots of people would be happier if both buyers and sellers of dogs needed some sort of licence.Methinks he is just stirring going by the tone of his posts here.
We own a staff as has my family for many many years, nowt wrong,We did find dogs trust got a bit too risk averse but Birmingham Dogs Home are spot on.
It’s not that they don’t want to rehome dogs, of course that’s their goal, but DT clearly got too scared. Maybe they were sued? To be fair we saw one good boy who came back to them twice because new owners couldn’t handle him, he was mouthy but not a risk in my mind (we’ve had an ex bait dog among others so have some experience) and he would be easily trained. He reminded me of our first dog from them but despite our children being ten years older since that one it was still a flat no. I feel letting inexperienced owners take any dog was the trigger for the tightening of their rules, shame as it spoilt it for experienced owners (and therefore the dogs) too. Some people would let a poodle get out of control. Dog owners need training too.
I happily recommend Birmingham Dogs Home. Full of staffies, mastiffs and anything that looks like a bully breed now - so sad. These dogs are wildly misunderstood.
I’m biased as we have a staffie and had a staffie cross previously- best dogs you can get. What drives me nuts is the negative press and the morons that blindly fall for it. This happens because a few owners/breeders spoil it for the many and this is why I’d be more than happy if every dog owner and breeder had to have a licence… to weed out the dodgy owners and breeders and prove openly that breed is not a problem, it’s people that are.We own a staff as has my family for many many years, nowt wrong,
just like children a product of their environment.