Costco Deal on Michelin Crossclimate 2

T6VanLife

T6VanLife

Member
T6 Pro
Anyone in the market for a set of Michelin Crossclimate 2 215/65 R16 102V and is a Costco member ?
Costco are hard to beat on tyre prices and these have been out of stock for over 2 months but they finally came back in this morning and are only £115 each fitted ! got mine ordered this morning. Be quick they wont last long at that price !

 
Last edited:
just checked my Bus and i have these on steels. . .


Crossclimate SUV 235/50r/18


1738262298234.png


...



looks like these are closest . .







1738262315019.png




....

£145 each fitted


1738262506198.png
 
putting in the sizone come up with this. . .

1738264370076.png
 
Their worth keeping an eye on for tyres, they don't keep a massive selection but you can get a great deal from them, my last set of All Season tyres (Goodyear Vector's) only cost me £81 a corner for 16's.
 
T6VanLife said:
Anyone in the market for a set of Michelin Crossclimate 2 215/65 R16 102V and is a Costco member ?
Costco are hard to beat on tyre prices and these have been out of stock for over 2 months but they finally came back in this morning and are only £115 each fitted ! got mine ordered this morning. Be quick they wont last long at that price !

Click to expand...

I am interested in this offer and understand that it has been discussed extensively elsewhere. However, I am still unclear about the key differences between the Michelin Agilis CrossClimate and the Michelin CrossClimate 2.


Additionally, I would like to understand the implications of fitting an SUV tire on a van. My van has been converted into a camper, so I want to ensure I choose the most suitable and safe option.


Any insights or recommendations would be greatly appreciated.
 
Letting AI have a go with my question above has given the below. Does this seem reasonable synopsis?


————-
The Michelin Agilis CrossClimate and Michelin CrossClimate 2 are both all-season tires, but they are designed for different vehicle types and usage conditions.





Key Differences Between Michelin Agilis CrossClimate & CrossClimate 2


FeatureMichelin Agilis CrossClimateMichelin CrossClimate 2
Designed ForVans, light commercial vehicles (LCVs), and campersPassenger cars and SUVs
Load RatingHigher, reinforced for heavier loadsLower, optimized for passenger vehicle comfort
DurabilityMore robust sidewalls, designed to handle curb impacts and rougher conditionsSofter sidewalls for ride comfort, not designed for commercial use
Tread PatternMore aggressive tread with additional durability features (stone ejectors, reinforced edges)Focuses on road grip, water evacuation, and ride smoothness
Mileage ExpectancyLonger lifespan due to commercial-grade constructionShorter lifespan compared to Agilis when used on heavier vehicles

Implications of Using an SUV Tire (CrossClimate 2) on a Van


1. Load Capacity & Safety Risks


  • SUVs are generally lighter than vans (especially camper vans with conversions).
  • Van tires (Agilis CrossClimate) have higher load ratings to support the additional weight safely.
  • Using SUV tires may lead to premature wear, sidewall failure, or even blowouts if the weight exceeds the tire's design limit.


2. Handling & Stability


  • Van tires are stiffer and provide better support under load.
  • SUV tires may lead to worse handling, especially when cornering, due to more flexible sidewalls.


3. Durability & Road Hazards


  • Agilis CrossClimate tires are reinforced against curb impacts and rough surfaces common with vans.
  • CrossClimate 2 tires, being passenger/SUV-focused, may wear out faster under a heavy camper van.


4. Insurance & Legal Compliance


  • Many regions require load-rated tires appropriate for the vehicle's weight.
  • If an SUV tire fails and causes an accident, insurance may not cover damages due to incorrect tire usage.



Which Tire is Best for Your Camper Van?



For a camper van conversion, the Michelin Agilis CrossClimate is the safer, more durable choice. It is designed specifically to handle higher loads, extended journeys, and varying terrain while maintaining excellent grip in all seasons.


If you have a lighter camper van and primarily drive on roads with no heavy loading, the CrossClimate 2 could work, but it's a risk in terms of durability, handling, and insurance validity.
 
manicism said:
If you have a lighter camper van and primarily drive on roads with no heavy loading, the CrossClimate 2 could work, but it's a risk in terms of durability, handling, and insurance validity.
Click to expand...

A bit misleading.
If you are using tyres that are correctly load rated for your particular vehicle there is no question of insurance validity.
 
Well I have one of the T6's that has each axel rated at 1550Kg, which means technically I could get away with a 99 rated tyre.
A 102 rating gives me personally plenty of overhead as my van is still a panel van by day and is completely empty 99.5% of the time as its only ever used for delivering & collecting the furniture I make, its converted to a camper only about 6 times a year (hopefully more this year)
The V speed rating is a moot point as I drive a vehicle with 100Hp and the aerodynamics of a cathedral, the chances of even getting over halfway to the 149mph rating is nestled between zero & nill......... :cry:
 
VWDAZ71 said:
www.blackcircles.com

Buy Michelin Agilis CrossClimate Tyres | Reviews and Prices | Blackcircles

Buy tyres online and get them fitted locally with Blackcircles. Lifetime Guarantee now on all car, van & SUV tyres. Peace of mind, at no extra cost.
www.blackcircles.com www.blackcircles.com

www.blackcircles.com

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV 215/50 R18 at Blackcircles.com

Buy tyres online and get them fitted locally with Blackcircles. Lifetime Guarantee now on all car, van & SUV tyres. Peace of mind, at no extra cost.
www.blackcircles.com www.blackcircles.com
Click to expand...
Agilis only go up to 235 i want 255.
 
I found COSTCO difficult to deal with. Wanted 2 x Michelins for Audi Q5 fronts. wouldnt fit them on the front said they had to put on the back, read this before but not convinced of the logic but ok.

so their next rule is that the tyres they will now move from back to front have to be matching tyres and I seem to recall >5mm tread so quite a bit above minimum.... again Ok get that ish.

unfortunately whilst both tyres were were above their limit and the same tread pattern and same named brands one had a one letter difference on the speed rating so something like 130mph compared to 135mph. U and H or V or something like

They would not move them or fit the new ones to the front .... disappointed at the wasted time having had to pay up front and order the correct size in. Refund and lost sale was the only outcome, felt a strange experience
 
  • Like
Reactions: CAB
Hilly64 said:
I found COSTCO difficult to deal with. Wanted 2 x Michelins for Audi Q5 fronts. wouldnt fit them on the front said they had to put on the back, read this before but not convinced of the logic but ok.

so their next rule is that the tyres they will now move from back to front have to be matching tyres and I seem to recall >5mm tread so quite a bit above minimum.... again Ok get that ish.

unfortunately whilst both tyres were were above their limit and the same tread pattern and same named brands one had a one letter difference on the speed rating so something like 130mph compared to 135mph. U and H or V or something like

They would not move them or fit the new ones to the front .... disappointed at the wasted time having had to pay up front and order the correct size in. Refund and lost sale was the only outcome, felt a strange experience
Click to expand...
OK, the logic is that new tyres should be fitted to the rear, this is due to safety and handling. More grip on the rear would make understeer happen before oversteer. It is much to control understeer than oversteer. Loss grip at the front means the vehicle will tend to go in a straighter line. Loss of grip at the rear can mean you go into a spin.
Unmatched tyres should not be fitted on an axel.
 
Skyliner33 said:
OK, the logic is that new tyres should be fitted to the rear, this is due to safety and handling. More grip on the rear would make understeer happen before oversteer. It is much to control understeer than oversteer. Loss grip at the front means the vehicle will tend to go in a straighter line. Loss of grip at the rear can mean you go into a spin.
Unmatched tyres should not be fitted on an axel.
Click to expand...
Yes read that about front vs back plus apparently statistically there are more punctures to rears

One letter difference on tyres = unmatched??
 
Hilly64 said:
Yes read that about front vs back plus apparently statistically there are more punctures to rears

One letter difference on tyres = unmatched??
Click to expand...
Yes, apparently it’s because the front tyre flicks up the offending item and so it isn’t lying flat when the rear goes over it.

Well they are different, so yes.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

mrMike
T6 3D Printed Top Dash Tray with Lids
Replies
16
Views
2K
mrMike
mrMike
Sparkyis
Custom fit colour coded leak- free awning rails to fit under roof bar feet- How I did it
Replies
6
Views
3K
Ralpher
R
Skyliner33
Looking for a caravan? Funny eBay ad
Replies
12
Views
5K
russvphoto
russvphoto
Back
Top