
Michelin CrossClimate SUV 255/55 R18 at Blackcircles.com
Buy tyres online and get them fitted locally with Blackcircles. Lifetime Guarantee now on all car, van & SUV tyres. Peace of mind, at no extra cost.
ORDERING

Last edited:
Crossclimate 2s are great as a 3 season tyre but NOT for summer use on a camper in my experience. In the heat they get way too soft and can get squirrelly, I've run them in the UK, France and Spain between -5 and 30 and they do almost everything really well just not temps above 23 there of thereabouts.
I agree, but out of the two options the MCC wins IMO; the MCC2 is even better, and actually, the Nokian is the most chunky when you look face on; but viewed in side profile the MCC is better. I think I've got all these variants in my possession at this moment. Including the Michelin Agilis CC, which looks fab, just limited in sizes; and has very high loadings for a T6I dont think the mcc is chunky enough
I’ve just moved from the standard vancontacts 215/60 R17 to CC2 235/55 17 and my first impressions are the opposite - average fuel consumption used to be in the high 30s but now seems to be up to 40’s - too early to tell for definite though . This is on my T32 4motionHello everyone. I was recently debating what tyres you get for my 140 T6 kombi (after discovering the Davanti’s that VW approved used fitted on the rear axle weren’t appropriately load rated!).
In the end I settled on Michelin cross climate 2’s in a 235/55r17 on my Devonports. This was having read loads of good reviews. And I must say, I’m quite disappointed. I used to easily eek out 40+ mpg on my short commute and 45+mpg on a run. Now I struggle to hit 35 on a commute and 40 on a run. You can feel this in acceleration/performance too. Hills that I would cruise up in 6th now require a shift to 5th.
Steering feel is a bit Woolley now too, however this doesn’t bother me as… it’s a van! More just an observation. Road noise is different, but not nescesarily better/worse. They don’t ping off speed bumps/potholes as much, but there is a slightly noticable low frequency hum.
I will say that they offer pretty decent cold weather grip though. Which is ultimately why I bought them. I was just hoping for more in the way of economy. As a result, I’ll probably be after some new wheels in the spring to run with summer tyres. Just thought I would share my experience and was wondering if anyone else has found the same?
I have a T28 camper conversion with uprated rear springs, I went with CC+ SUV XL 215 65 16s on a 2nd pair of Claytons just for winter use, I run them at 50psi in a van which is normally fully loaded for winter trips, 2 people, dog, clothes, food etc all the usual campervan stuff and this time with a towbar mounted bike rack fitted with a road bike and a storage box full of my cycling stuff, a couple of wetsuits etc The CC+ do indeed have a more flexible sidewall than the stock Hancooks I run over summer and they are all the better for it, they ride much more smoothly and are less harsh than the Hancooks.Thanks for all the input, it's really useful for a numpty like me!
I am about to have 4 All Season tyres fitted and have settled on the Michelin CC's. However, I'm not quite sure what my options are/which model to go for. I have a 2018 T6 T28 campervan conversion which currently has the original Hankook RA28E in 205/65 R16C 107/105T on Clayton's. The online tyre retailers default to the Agilis CrossClimate which I believe is the van specific tyre in the CC range. Other's in this thread have fitted CrossClimate 2's or CrossClimate+ SUV XL etc. I think the choice of which model CC is appropriate for each vehicle depends on wheel size and load rating?
For my vehicle, if I go with the same size tyre as currently fitted (205/65 16), the choice is the Agilis CrossClimate (107 load rating) however a tyre size 215/65 16 throws up the options of:
1) CrossClimate 2 XL 215/65 16 V(102) (there is also a 98 load rated option but from checking @Pauly pinned post about tyres and wheels I need minimum 100 load rating for my T28)
2) Agilis CrossClimate 215/65 16 T(106)
3) Agilis CrossClimate 215/65 16 T(109)
As a road and cross cyclist, I'm acutely aware of the impact tyres have on the ride quality of a bike - differing tyre width, latex vs butyl inner tubes, using handmade tubulars/open tubulars with incredibly flexible side walls vs stiff, tread design etc. and also crucially having the right pressure has a huge impact. What I don't know is how the various options for car/van tyres affect the ride quality and safety/performance.
For example, would the CrossClimate 2 XL 215/65 16 V (102) give a better ride quality due to having a lower load rating (which I assume means less stiff sidewall?) than the Agilis CrossClimate 215/65 16 T(106) (which in turn would be better than the 109)? Or would I simply not notice
Is it appropriate for me to consider the 215/65 size tyre rather than the 205/65? If it is appropriate, any thoughts on the differences in performance between the CrossClimate2, CrossClimate+ and the Agilis CrossClimate?
Apologies for all the questions, as you can see I've got myself a bit lost!![]()
@Carbon13 Thanks for your reply and the bike analogy. I'm completely with you on the 23's to 28's etc. - I've just put some 29 FMB open tubular's on my 'summer' bike and they're oh so smooth!I have a T28 camper conversion with uprated rear springs, I went with CC+ SUV XL 215 65 16s on a 2nd pair of Claytons just for winter use, I run them at 50psi in a van which is normally fully loaded for winter trips, 2 people, dog, clothes, food etc all the usual campervan stuff and this time with a towbar mounted bike rack fitted with a road bike and a storage box full of my cycling stuff, a couple of wetsuits etc The CC+ do indeed have a more flexible sidewall than the stock Hancooks I run over summer and they are all the better for it, they ride much more smoothly and are less harsh than the Hancooks.
For a bike comparison it's like going from a 23 to a 28 and wondering why you didn't do it years ago.......I've gone 32 now and it's even better![]()