Interesting post @Tourershine. I couple of weeks ago I called into VW commercial in Preston. Spoke to the paint warranty person. He has asked me to take some photos and email them. I took some with my phone and emailed them to him. He replied that they were not clear enough, and asked if I could get some better ones. So I got my camera out and took some more, however I've not sent them yeat as the file sizes are too big to email. As he has just returned from 2 weeks holiday I am thinking of goint back to Preston some time this week, maybe Saturday to take the SD card so he can copy them, and if not good enough take some more.
However reading the above I am wondering if its worth the hassle and might as well look into getting them fixed on my own. Or if they are just left how much worse will they get? To me I'm thinking that they are getting worse, but that could also be because I am noticing them a lot more as I work on improving the finish of the paint.
Decisions, decisions.
I'm taking a stab at this, but the photo clarity issue is a delaying tactic within the warranty department. They rejected my photos twice, and then the dealers own photos once, claiming they weren't clear enough, when they were perfectly clear.
They initially messed up by rejecting the claim and quoting the standard 'outside influences' patter after the 1st set of photos, to then say several days later that the images weren't clear enough. When I questioned how they'd rejected the claim on the evidence of the images, that they apparently couldn't see clear enough, it was met with silence and confusion.
This whole debacle is designed to be as difficult as possible, knowing that many people will just give up the fight (even more so when people are asked to pay £180 out of their own pockets for the inspection)
I still stand by my choice to uphold this complaint, simply because it's just not good enough for something to corrode this fast, but would I bother going through all this hassle again?? Maybe not.