Did you make a decision on this in the end? Looking at a van with 16s and weighing up the options - the only ones on the door panel in 16 are 205/65/16c 107/105 and 215/65/16c 106/104. I know other people have different tyres but I dont really understand the insurance etc impact of going for a lower rated tyre and furthermore that people say 102 can be enough. If so, that opens up the option of traditional crossclimate 2 instead of agilis which a fuel economy rating of B instead of D which is quite appealing...
Sorry for slow reply sam_glasgow. Been so busy working on van I've not been watching emails/ Forums!
Yes, I made my decision and was really happy with it until I read your comments and wondered if I'd overlooked an even better option!
I went for a set of Agilis CrossClimates, size 215/65, and I love 'em! They run at
much lower pressures than the ones they replaced (max. pressure 54psi, compared with 79 for the old Continentals!!), and they're also 6-ply rather than 8, which are presumably are the reasons they give a
much more comfortable ride, despite having a 106 load rating, which is more than enough. Also, they have a
relatively chunky tread, which people say grips well on slippery campsites, etc, although I've not tested that yet (the tread's nothing like the really knobbly ones you see on some vans, though; I imagine they're not so nice on the road).
The downsides of the Agilises are a) as you say, they're not as good as some re fuel efficiency (which I'm keeping an eye on) and b) the chunky-ish tread does produce a slight rumble at higher speeds/ on certain surfaces. I'm sensitive to excess noise, but as they're quieter overall than the previous set and I'm likely to be keeping the speed down for financial and environmental reasons, I think I'm going to get on fine with them, especially as the extra grip might be very useful now and again.
The reason your message made me think again is that I'd totally overlooked the CrossClimate 2 option! Perhaps they just didn't come up when I did my searches, or maybe I discounted them in the belief that they're more of an SUV tyre than a van tyre, although I'm not sure what difference that makes if the load rating is up to scratch. Perhaps van tyres have extra reinforcement to cope with the kerbing and other abuse they're subject to, which I'd guess isn't such an issue for most of us on this forum. I certainly would have considered them if I'd known they were suitable and their efficiency rating is that much better!
I'd be very interested if anyone else could shed any light on the pros and cons of CrossClimate 2 tyres, or of SUV tyres, fitted to Transporters.
Anyway, hope you end up with tyres you're happy with. They don't always get the attention they deserve, considering how important they are, and they're not cheap, either (£614 inc. Vat for mine, and that was with 15% off).