Please clarify - do you mean soot level doesn't decrease, or something else?trying to figure out why passive regen doesn’t get recorded by the ecu
should the particle matter sensor exhaust temperature be higher than what the sensor is reading after a trip down the motorway?
Sounds normal to me - see belowAfter a few logs it never goes above 26 degrees……
Yes, it does unless you can keep exhaust temperature in the DPF at or above 600 °C. Then the soot burn rate would exceed soot accumulation rate. To make that happen the speed needs to be kept well above 80 mph.I have found that soot builds up regardless of a long journey
Possibly just a software issue - there was an update campaign to cure this issue.I also get a P20EE that shows up after a longer run only.
I think the temperature is not engine's exhaust temperature but sensor's own "exhaust" temperature as the particle sensor also "regenerates" itself regularly as part of particle detection measurement. Next to particle sensor there is a deidcated exhaust temperature sensor which should show more "normal" values.So I was looking for other reasons for this and noticed the temp is low for a motorway journey considering it states exhaust temps in that particular sensor
IDE00025 Coolant temperature 22 °C
IDE00196 Engine oil temperature 21.1 °C
IDE07987 Particle sensor: exhaust temperature 2.2 °C
IDE00025 Coolant temperature -27 °C
IDE00196 Engine oil temperature -27.6 °C
IDE07987 Particle sensor: exhaust temperature -3.2 °C
I can see from the other post it’s more the current draw that shows how it’s working? I will log that also. I wasn’t to aware of the temp reading characteristics, just thought it looked odd. I’ve attached a log graph of ad blue quality and nox levels. Should the able keep up with the nox levels and they seem a bit high to me?Yes, it does unless you can keep exhaust temperature in the DPF at or above 600 °C. Then the soot burn rate would exceed soot accumulation rate. To make that happen the speed needs to be kept well above 80 mph.
Possibly just a software issue - there was an update campaign to cure this issue.
![]()
[T6_measured] NOx emissions, AdBlue consumption, DPF regeneration - Before and after ECU update
Introduction An update campaign for T6 EU6 diesel engines took place in 2019-20. Affected engines were on van of model years MY16-MY18, including some of MY19. For M1 class (passenger carriers, VIN WV2...) the update was an official recall. For N1 class (VIN WV1....) the update was not...www.t6forum.com
I think the temperature is not engine's exhaust temperature but sensor's own "exhaust" temperature as the particle sensor also "regenerates" itself regularly as part of particle detection measurement. Next to particle sensor there is a deidcated exhaust temperature sensor which should show more "normal" values.
Also I'm not sure how to interpret the value as originally it's just 16 bits of data. The diagnostic tool interprets it as signed integer divided by 10 to show us what we see - maximum typically about 26 units. However, just checked quite a few logs of cold engines at various ambient temperatures and I'm inclined to believe the number diagnostic tool now shows should be actually multiplied by 10 (thus no scaling of the CANbus 16 bit data).
Code:IDE00025 Coolant temperature 22 °C IDE00196 Engine oil temperature 21.1 °C IDE07987 Particle sensor: exhaust temperature 2.2 °C
Code:IDE00025 Coolant temperature -27 °C IDE00196 Engine oil temperature -27.6 °C IDE07987 Particle sensor: exhaust temperature -3.2 °C
That was a hot engine on motorway. The nox sensor only wakes up at a certain temperature so no reading when coldWas that graph taken from a cold or hot engine?
If cold, could you take a reading from a hot one (and v.v) - see if there is a marked difference.
Could you please post the actual data - it's a bit difficult to interpret from the picture what e.g. the average would be - as I think it's the long term average that counts, not individual peaks. Would be useful to include in data logs also vehicle speed, air mass flow and exhaust temperature into DPF to evaluate engine load.I’ve attached a log graph of ad blue quality and nox levels. Should the able keep up with the nox levels and they seem a bit high to me?
The most noticeable moment for passive regeneration is immediately after DPF regeneration has finished (either at 9.00 or 6.00 grams of soot calculated) as the DPF is still hot enough for a few minutes - the soot level still decreases some time and eventually starts climbing again when DPF output temperature reaches about 500 C.it has never passively decreased the soot in the DPF
I'm highly confident that by using 6th gear at the same engine revs the passive regeneration would lower the soot valueit is usually in 4th gear at 3000-3200 rpm -
I’ll send the vcds log over! I was logging today the PM sensor calculated current and it stayed at 0 through out the journey. Not sure if that is normal?Could you please post the actual data - it's a bit difficult to interpret from the picture what e.g. the average would be - as I think it's the long term average that counts, not individual peaks. Would be useful to include in data logs also vehicle speed, air mass flow and exhaust temperature into DPF to evaluate engine load.
That's a good thingthe PM sensor calculated current and it stayed at 0 through out the journey.
Ah! Thats what that meansThat's a good thing= no soot passed through the PDF.
A different case - soot registered - below:
![]()
[T6_measured] Monitoring DPF regeneration, DPF condition, EGR operation
@ebiii Attached an addendum to Torque - containing the following T6 PIDs "T6-01 Lambda" "T6-01 NOx sensor" "T6-01 Particle sensor current" "T6-01 Particle sensor operation time" NOTE: "T6-01 Particle sensor operation time" will be logged only once in 10 seconds - to not unnecessarily slow down...www.t6forum.com