Appreciate your comments. Agreed some of this just doesn't add up.
The replacement turbo was definitely a brand new VW part, but it was slightly different to one that came off as VW had modified the design of the original 102 item.. I have the box the new turbo came in and have the purchase order paperwork.
If the mapping was at fault why did the original turbo last a good few miles before it failed.
Also, if the mapping was as fault then surely over fuelling or over boosting would have been obvious - black smoke for over fuelling. Too much boost pressure would give a big surge in power. I had neither.
And I am sceptical about the power increase claim. There's no way in my mind I was getting 170ps. I could barely notice the difference post map.
Now I'm sure Quantum aim to be an honest legitimate firm and I currently have no evidence to refute their power gain claims, but I need convincing as to how just a re-map can liberate so much more power. It simply doesn't make sense. If the map just exploits the potential power output as the entire hardware of the engine unit manufactured by VW is the same as for the 102, 105 and 180ps models I'm a monkey.
Does anyone know if this is the case? If a102ps engine was a detuned 180ps engine it would be bullet proof.
And then you could simply copy the 180ps engine ECU mapping and apply it to the 102ps. Nobody seems to be able to give me a sensible answer to this.
I suspect the failure is not the mapping, but something else like turbo oil feed or something else and that the local garage did not have the wherewithal to do a proper failure diagnosis. Now they are just hiding behind the re-map as the cause for the second failure and have washed their hands of any further involvement.