204 DSG intermittent momentary power loss

oh, ok, im a complete newb to logging and what not, ill have another go today.
do I need to drive the van for each log to be saved?
1) blockmap - engine not running - just turn ignition on and create the blockmap file (cold engine is just fine)
2) Turbo actuator test - engine idling (cold engine is just fine)
3) Turbo changeover valve test - engine idling (cold engine is just fine)
4) EGR test 1st - engine idling (cold engine is just fine)
5) EGR test 2nd - hot engine idling - thus a bit of driving to warm up the exhaust
 
log files from earlier
Thank you very much for the log files - and especially having markers in the files - helps to pinpoint and confirm the moments of the issues.

Some preliminary thoughts... about the last logged session (of total of three in the recording).

Large scale view in time of markers whereabouts​

1743857174783.png

A downselected period for closer view - from 760 to 775 seconds​

Well, probably the most illuminating period because of
  • high vehicle speed = high engine load
  • only few gear changes
  • also "things" happen at slower rate thus easier to understand

General conditions - speed, engine revs​

1743841444346.png
No noticeable glitches in engine speed signal - not even by zooming in.

Turbo actuators​

1743843630033.png

Obviously at about 764 seconds the pedal was floored, the gear was stepped down to 4th at 764 seconds, and stepped up into 5th at 768.5 seconds.

Turbo vane actuator (blue) and turbine changeover actuator (grey) reach and stay at their "full blast" positions.
Turbo wastegate (red) regulates charge pressure until...

Charge pressures as seen by the ECU​

1743843484896.png

I guess the pressure drop seen at 767 and 770.5 seconds drive the ECU to start to close the wastegate (squared red in picture one above).

Air mass flow & engine torque​

1743846230999.png

Air mass flow is in sync with charge pressure - quite naturally. And of course the recorded/calculated engine torque follows.


QUESTION - does this happen also on gear 7?

In the log the 6th gear was used and marked at 830 seconds (below).

1743857584115.png

1743857601063.png



It has been remapped, though I don't think it was a very good one.
My guess is that the turbo just can't handle the excessive air flow and the airflow in turbine vanes simply suddenly "slips" ???

Unfortunately I don't have reference values at the same conditions (4th gear full blast at and above 3800 RPM). Only thing similar by speed I found was only 130 grams/second of air flow - just barely half - but that's on 7th gear so also number of cylinder fill-ups is about half of what would have been on 4th gear.

Of course a culprit could also be a misbehaving manifold pressure sensor (which are known to get clogged). Or misbehaving wastegate actuator or valve.
 
Thank you so much for your input & analysis

It happens in all gears if I pull away wile towing the caravan, I booted it in the logging to try to simulate that.
I’ll get the block file and other tests you requested today.

I’d like to get to a point where we can isolate a certain part, or few suspect parts that I need to look into, rather than shooting in the dark at random parts and getting nowhere with it.

We aren’t going away to Europe with it this year, but I’m building a bit of a fear of the motorway hills around Santander in Spain, anyone who’s been there will know them.
The thought of attempting to scale those hills with this high demand / load power dropping out, isn’t very appealing at all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mmi
turbo and recirculation test
Thank you.

Turbo actuator test - sweeps a few times from min to max - OK as expected based on the logged journey.

1744041538822.png

Turbine changeover valve test - sweeps a few times from min to max - OK as expected based on the logged journey.

1744041490067.png

Also both pressure sensors read same value as seen earlier thus no suspects there either.

1744045746130.png

Also the wastegate can also be tested using VCDS but the recorded data already shows that it operates correctly.
Just fullfilled/edited the procedure into the posting



I’d like to get to a point where we can isolate a certain part, or few suspect parts that I need to look into, rather than shooting in the dark at random parts and getting nowhere with it.
I think the issue is that the requested 3.5 bar charge pressure is simply too much asked. Stock CXEB does at maximum only 3.1 bar.

Still interested to see results of the EGR test - to evaluate DPF condition - as the blockmap data a kind of suggests some degree of blockage there.
4) EGR test 1st - engine idling (cold engine is just fine)
5) EGR test 2nd - hot engine idling - thus a bit of driving to warm up the exhaust
 
Once again, thank you!

I’ll try to get the EGR & watergate actuator tests done this evening.

Does the van need to be driven or will a period of ticking over be ok to get the exhaust hot enough?
 
  • Like
Reactions: mmi
I’ll do this in the morning, I just realised the van is parked rot next to the neighbours house, I don’t think they’d appreciate me running tests at 22:21
 
  • Like
Reactions: mmi
waste gate actuator test
I believe the below is just ECU output to sweep the wastegate actuator from it's minimum to maximum thus not it's actual position.

I believe there actually is no electrical feedback from the actuator itself. Can't find anything suitable in measurement values. Also the workshop manual wastegate adjustment procedure doesn't give anything electrical reference - just a mechanical setting.
Code:
– Apply a vacuum of 390 ± 10 mbar to vacuum unit.
– Move lever arm -1- in direction of -arrow- and hold in closed position.
– Screw nut -2- in direction of vacuum unit until it comes into contact with lever arm -1-.
Thus the wastegate adjustment feedback comes from pressure sensors to relieve excessive pressure.

1744181531028.png

Anyways, we can indirectly verify that the wastegate actually does move by monitoring e.g. the pressures after the turbos. The sensors plotted are actual values from the sensors (below)
1744181554474.png

I would conclude that the wastegate works correctly.



Just to complement the above - also was verified the other two actuators do not affect analysis as they are stationary during wastegate sweeping. They are swept into their "rest" position and held there during the test (below). They do have position sensors - read as voltage below.

1744181844977.png
 
Part way through with a few more datapoints

There seems to be a lot of soot and ash mass in there, do you think that could be causing engine back pressure and the boost to spike and stall the turbo vanes momentarily?

Screenshot 2025-04-09 at 08.10.15.png
 
hot erg test log is attached

Engine RPM​

1744186827387.png

EGR valve position​

1744192804072.png
  • 0 = no exhaust recirculation,
  • negative value = exhaust recirculation through the EGR cooler
  • positive value = EGR cooler bypassed - not seen above, but somewhat explained in [T6_measured] Winter specialities

Airflow at intake while EGR valve is sweeped​

1744189124016.png


An estimate of EGR cooler performance based on air flow ratios between EGR min/max positions​

1744187162540.png
Based on reference data in [T6_measured] 01-Engine - Built-in test for EGR - very good.


Differential pressure across the DPF​


1744189198280.png
1744187338017.png

Fairly high pressures were observed - in comparison with data in [T6_measured] 01-Engine - Built-in test for EGR
Of course fairly high soot content at the time of test contributes to higher values (as the pressures will be lower immediately after DPF regeration)

Differential pressure across the DPF - Double scaled illustration​

1744189062809.png

Temperatures along the exhaust pipe​

just to verify the conditions are comparable with other measurements as the DPF differential pressure strongly correlates with DPF temperature
1744187781506.png
 
Thanks again for your time!

So as I understand… I may be wrong… EGR is good, DPF, is good, turbo actuators are all good…

So we’re looking at the remap as the possible problem as it’s asking for too much boost?
 
  • Like
Reactions: mmi

There seems to be a lot of soot and ash mass in there, do you think that could be causing engine back pressure and the boost to spike and stall the turbo vanes momentarily?
That's a possibility - at least a contributing factor - especially if the power loss didn't happen earlier.

1744189453866.png
The ash mass is a calculalated value for DPF lifetime expectancy - it's assumed that at 110 g it's all finished.

However, I'm more concerned about relationship between soot calculated and soot "measured".
1744189703349.png
Normally DPF regeneration is triggered solely on calculated value which sweeps from 5..6 to 24 grams (on your engine).
As the "measured" is most likely based on differential pressure across DPF, it normally is much less than the calculated.
However, whenever the "measured" reaches the calculated it will take the control of the DPF regeneration.

In the blockmap data we see that DPF has reached the state that soot measured can take the controls. E.g. on April 3rd the DPF regeneration will be triggered by soot measured (16 grams calculated vs. already 23.08 grams "measured" - regen will be triggered at 24 grams)

1744190491544.png

My statement would be that the DPF needs to be replaced (or cleaned) in any case fairly soon to avoid too frequent DPF regens (which actually are already happening every now and then (16 vs. 23 grams).

It's probably the accumulated ash which is the potential problem - the ash won't burn away being a residual of burned soot and oil additives.

Thanks again for your time!

So as I understand… I may be wrong… EGR is good, DPF, is good, turbo actuators are all good…

So we’re looking at the remap as the possible problem as it’s asking for too much boost?
EGR + cooler = ok
DPF is about to reach critical state - quite possibly contributing to the power loss issue, too.
Turbo actuators = ok
Fuel pressure = ok (though not mentioned here)


A thought about DPF flushing on T6​

 
Back
Top