Despite lots of searching, I never did find anyone who'd documented this on a T6.1 (or at least posted about it). So I got brave (or foolish) one evening and decided to try it regardless and finally... success! So thought I'd come back here and post my results in the hope it helps somebody else out.
So as a reminder, my conversion was based on a 22-plate T6.1 Startline (T30 150 DSG) with optional business pack. So the OEM wheels were 16 inch steels with 205/65 R16 tyres. As posted previously, the K-number (IDE00842) doesn't seem to exist on the T6.1 and instead there's just two different IDE00845 values, one for trip distance (2066mm) and one for speed (2149mm).
View attachment 159451
When I looked at the long coding helper I could see my wheel circumference was set to variant 1 - makes sense given the 16" steels are probably the smallest wheels fitted to the T6.1 out of the factory.
So with my 275/40/20's fitted, the speedo is reading ~4mph low at 70mph (speedo = 66mph, measured GPS speed = 70mph) which is pretty much in line with what willtheyfit.com tells me.
View attachment 159452
Now the scary part. There's plenty of evidence on various forums and in this thread that changing the wheel variant on the new T6.1 platform is a one-way street. i.e. you can increase the variant but not go backwards. So my approach was to increment the variant one step at a time, hoping they scaled in a relatively linear fashion.
Step 1 - set to variant 2. Coding was rejected (Request out of range).
View attachment 159453
Step 2 - set to variant 3. This time coding was accepted, and my IDE00845 values were increased to 2111mm / 2195mm respectively.
View attachment 159455
A quick test drive confirmed my speedo error was reduced to about 2-3 mph.
Step 4 - set to variant 4. Coding was rejected (Request out of range).
Step 5 - set to variant 5. Coding was rejected (Request out of range).
Step 6 - set to variant 6. Coding was accepted, and my IDE00845 values were increased to 2195mm / 2294 mm.
View attachment 159456
Another test drive and now my speedo is pretty much bang on. At this stage I was very happy to call it quits. Whilst I could have tweaked it higher so that the speedo reads a little higher than actual (as is common practise), I wasn't willing to risk a large leap in circumference knowing that I couldn't revert back. Incidentally I did try going backwards just to verify, and can confirm you get 'Coding Rejected Error 22' which prevents you from doing so.
Thanks to everyone who chipped in with advice, particularly 'AudiGit' on the Ross-Tech forums (where there's a similar thread to this) who gave me sufficient confidence to go for it!
I hope this helps out anyone looking to do a similar tweak.