No respect for other people's property

The little scrotes need to learn respect. One way or another. We did. I would always knock on the door if I broke something as a kid cos me dad would have done mad. It is totally about respect for property. I now have it. In spades.

My neighbor had her Merc run into whilst parked up outside the house and the idiots stopped to look. All captured on CCTV. Police are dealing with it as their number plate was recorded. Muppets.
 
The little scrotes need to learn respect. One way or another. We did. I would always knock on the door if I broke something as a kid cos me dad would have done mad. It is totally about respect for property. I now have it. In spades.

My neighbor had her Merc run into whilst parked up outside the house and the idiots stopped to look. All captured on CCTV. Police are dealing with it as their number plate was recorded. Muppets.
I loved the story I read recently where the multiple cameras on a Tesla (parked up in a supermarket) recorded the person who had keyed it!
 
I loved the story I read recently where the multiple cameras on a Tesla (parked up in a supermarket) recorded the person who had keyed it!
Yes, that despicable woman did it deliberately. It was good to see she was caught and convicted though!
Even after reading press reports I still couldn't understand what was going through her head when she did it. Vile creature.
 
Yes, that despicable woman did it deliberately. It was good to see she was caught and convicted though!
Even after reading press reports I still couldn't understand what was going through her head when she did it. Vile creature.
Green-eyed monster of envy?
 
Disagree mate, technically it's an RTC under legal definition as damage has been caused owing to the presence of a motor vehicle on a road. The cyclist is another road user. No details were left by either party so it reportable by the police.
I don't think the police would touch that as RTC, Yes it may fit the definition of a RTC but when judgement and resources applied, it wouldn't get raised. You may get an Incident number.
 
I don't think the police would touch that as RTC, Yes it may fit the definition of a RTC but when judgement and resources applied, it wouldn't get raised. You may get an Incident number.
In fairness, @Sackmycook was debating the technical definition with me - and I conceded that he was correct - rather than offering specific advice on what to do!
 
Of course, the other way of looking at it, is that it's criminal damage.....the lad may have been reckless as to whether damage would be caused ....
.....just throwing that out there.
 
It would be a very brave/foolish Force or Constabulary that wouldn't record the incident one way or the other. Whether its investigated is totally another matter dependant or a large number of factors.
HMRC Insp of Const...very hot on crime recording and rightly so.
 
I wonder what the situation would be next week when cyclists should be off the pavement?

I didn't think we should ride on the pavement now, but highway code changes will emphasis stronger 'guidance'.
 
I wonder what the situation would be next week when cyclists should be off the pavement?

I didn't think we should ride on the pavement now, but highway code changes will emphasis stronger 'guidance'.
Is this when those barmy new rules about priority come into play?
 
Barmy in what way?
If you are sat with your indicator on to turn right at a junction into a side road and a cyclist overtakes you as you turn and you knock him off it will be the car drivers fault.
 
Also, according to the news, if you are in a car and turning into a side road and a pedestrian is waiting to cross the side road, you have to give way to the pedestrian.
 
If you are sat with your indicator on to turn right at a junction into a side road and a cyclist overtakes you as you turn and you knock him off it will be the car drivers fault.
I can't imagine a scenario where that would be the case
 
Back
Top