Silly question probably but here goes, just been and had the tyres taken off my banded steelies (245/45/18). With the tyres off I thought Christ they look wide, so I thought I’d measure them. Just to confirm it’s not the overall width of the wheel I measure, it’s bead to bead yes?

Thanks

Lee
Yes…. I did the same thing with a previous set of banded steels and the 9.5” rear measured at least 10”!
 
Hmmm, they are square fitment at ET30 and 9J all round and they look perfect at the front on @T6ARF s van (he has a spacer on the rear though) and load rating is ok for T32, so not sure why they need to ‘rework’ anything?

If you read the comments on the Insta post that @Stu007 shared THQ are saying they had to machine the fronts to get them to sit like that - probably because at ET30 and 9J they don’t tuck with the air ride - us peasants with normal suspension and not as low will probably not need a different offset on the front as T6ARFs van has shown.
Being the devil's advocate, doesn't the fact he needed to fit spacers to make them look perfect suggest they do need a 'rework'. ie need to fit a spacer to the rear to match the front, or need to increase the front offset to match the rear?

It's all a matter of taste but I think the rear is better without the spacer, but the front pokes too much, so the pair doesn't look balanced.
Also as a company I would have thought it will be more profitable to sell wheels that match all transporters rather than ones that wont fit on low vans?
 
Do one of you moderator chaps think this specific wheel discussion needs to be moved to it’s own thread (Rotiform STL)…. might be useful for anyone thinking of these wheels in the future?? And it’s hijacked the Team Banded Brothers thread quite enough.
 
Being the devil's advocate, doesn't the fact he needed to fit spacers to make them look perfect suggest they do need a 'rework'. ie need to fit a spacer to the rear to match the front, or need to increase the front offset to match the rear?

It's all a matter of taste but I think the rear is better without the spacer, but the front pokes too much, so the pair doesn't look balanced.
Also as a company I would have thought it will be more profitable to sell wheels that match all transporters rather than ones that wont fit on low vans?
Can I just say I didn’t ‘need’ to fit spacers…. it was my personal choice. I prefer the look of a bit more ‘poke’ rather than ‘tuck’. The fact is that the standard Transporter fitment has the rear wheels further in under the rear wing…. or at least that is how it appears. That’s why a lot of people running the same width wheels all round choose to run spacers on the rear. So it’s got nothing to do with this particular wheel.
 
Do one of you moderator chaps think this specific wheel discussion needs to be moved to it’s own thread (Rotiform STL)…. might be useful for anyone thinking of these wheels in the future?? And it’s hijacked the Team Banded Brothers thread quite enough.
It can be sorted. Anyone else think the same??
 
Do one of you moderator chaps think this specific wheel discussion needs to be moved to it’s own thread (Rotiform STL)…. might be useful for anyone thinking of these wheels in the future?? And it’s hijacked the Team Banded Brothers thread quite enough.
 
Any chance of moving the Rotiform STL posts from here to there please @BuilderJay ?
 
Out of interest what kind of tyre pressures are you all running on steels? 235/50/18 got 38 psi in at the minute and not sure if it’s right?

Cheers Lee
Any takers on what the general consensus is on tyre pressures for banded wheels?

Cheers Lee
 
What the et which might be the biggest factor? I have 9j et35 and don’t stick out.. had some Detroit Steels that stuck out like these..
 
Back
Top