I’m not trying to be provocative but will it really affect the value of a converted vehicle if it’s a “van with windows” rather than a motorcaravan on the V5? Basically it’s the same vehicle just not able to travel at 70mph on motorways and, ok it’s a big if, if the insurance companies accept it at its replacement value then it’s a name. Or am I missing something fundamental- again that’s an honest question.
Actually I'm fine with van with windows, whats irritating is I live in London, the ULEZ zone is coming our way and I will live in it from next year, couldn't afford a "coach built" that was new enough/petrol so went with a professional conversion that with all our savings we could just about afford, had no idea reclassification would be an issue. TBF, the guys we bought from didn'tknow either, it was April, so before it was clamped down on (when I rang DVLA about sending for reclass they said wait so I feel really purposefully mislead. Issue is/might be, vehicle value, if it becomes an issue but more so charges for eurotunnel, dartford crossing and London tunnels, it's just mean that we will be paying more for a vehicle that is no longer commercial use. I'm fine with the speed limits, its great for economy....just feels mean to do it without telling anyone and th eexcuses/reasons have shofted 3 times when I;ve given pics of loads of vans with tless "external features" than mine and they simply are ignorig that it didn't have a poptop roof when originally manfactured, if it was a private company we'd have them for trading standards, lying, comtradiction and misleading the public. Why can't they just say "van with windows - converted campervan" or something so insurance companies are easily please? Haven't tackled Adrian Flux yet as am awaiting response to my final protest letter....anyone had any issues with them on this?