Yes... but that's only half the story.Thanks to everyone for contributing to this thread, it's my first look into solar options and it's been very informative. As I'm still in the planning stage of my T6 conversion, I'm not certain what my power use will be. I am considering a 12V water heater which will be the largest load, but will be for occasional use only and mostly heating when driving. The other draw is the fridge, which is rated at 40W so quite efficient. @Dellmassive reported positively on the 160W PU panel, would the similar 180W be a good bet? 12V solar panels charging kits for caravans, motorhomes, boats, yachts, marine
Very interesting results. Which controller did you have before the Victron 100/30?The “headroom“ thing is more important than Victron and their retailers seem to be aware of.
On my caravan I had 2 x 175W Victron Bluesolar Poly panels which had a combined max theoretical output of 350W in ideal conditions.
The Victron MPPT calculator stated that the correct MPPT was 100/20.
Before the Xmas 2020, I installed a Smartsolar 100/30 as I had a spare 175W panel and was going to add it to my solar array on my roof. I installed the 100/30 in the winter and then due to lockdowns etc never found time to install the extra panel as the van is in storage. , (I will soon.)
The thing is that the two 175W panels had never given more than a max combined output of around 270-280 watts, even on clear days in June/July where I’d deliberately run down my batteries and also run loads to guarantee that the charger remained in a bulk charging state. (For geeky test purposes)
Check out the below screenshot from the last week where it’s been common to get P Max numbers which far exceed 300W and even the theoretical 350W max of the panels. I stress that it’s not been particularly bright and sunny and the daily yield of 1.39kWh was never achievable prior to upgrading the MPPT well above the recommended spec from Victron.
View attachment 116743
Victron SCC110020060R (100/20 as per the Victron MPPT calculator on their website for two Blue Solar 175W Poly panels in series.)Very interesting results. Which controller did you have before the Victron 100/30?
This is a really significant increase. I'd be tempted to present these results to Victron to see if matches their expectation and the relative performance comparison between controllers. Your results point to the 100/30 being a good value investment in terms of W/£.Victron SCC110020060R (100/20 as per the Victron MPPT calculator on their website for two Blue Solar 175W Poly panels in series.)
Since making the change, the improvement in solar yield has been really quite spectacular.
On dull days there is no real noticeable difference between the performance with the 100/20 and 100/30, but on any days with actual sun (The yellow thing in the sky), the yield is massively improved.
I first noticed this in early May when it became noticeable that whenever the panels see unobscured sun the MPPT chucks in over 320W. I would estimate that the VRM is showing around 30% more power generation than before the change in controller.
The only downsides are that the 100/30 is physically much bigger and costs more.
I was considering a 100/20 to allow for a second 180W panel, but a 100/30 may be a better bet.I doubt it will match Victron's expectations due the gains (that I've observed) far exceeding the info provided here.
I was wondering if I am missing something on how to spec these controllers as the above link seems to specify undersize controllers pretty much for every combination of panels that I require.
The rated charge output for the 100/30 is 30A and 20A for the 100/20. I am yet to install a third identical panel to the array, but it seems that with the third panel installed I will then find the 100/30 too small which contradicts Victron.
It's weird because if you look at @JBR80 's original query about a 100/20 being specified in preference to a 75/15, then I would say that the additional "headroom" isn't required as based on my recent findings I would ignore anything Victron tell me and spec the MPPT's rated charge output based on the panel power/system voltage! I.E.180W/12 = 15A.
(In theory there is already headroom in this because the system volatile will be 12-15V)
And another similar: JA Solar JAM60S10-340/MR BF Half CellIn an effort to try and track down an alternative to the 320w photonic universe panel: 12V solar panels charging kits for caravans, motorhomes, boats, yachts, marine
I found these: 340w Solar Panel (168x100cm) — Craig Solar
Specs and description look good, but it does feel like a roll of the dice. Any thoughts?
The “headroom“ thing is more important than Victron and their retailers seem to be aware of.
On my caravan I had 2 x 175W Victron Bluesolar Poly panels which had a combined max theoretical output of 350W in ideal conditions.
The Victron MPPT calculator stated that the correct MPPT was 100/20.
Before the Xmas 2020, I installed a Smartsolar 100/30 as I had a spare 175W panel and was going to add it to my solar array on my roof. I installed the 100/30 in the winter and then due to lockdowns etc never found time to install the extra panel as the van is in storage. , (I will soon.)
The thing is that the two 175W panels had never given more than a max combined output of around 270-280 watts, even on clear days in June/July where I’d deliberately run down my batteries and also run loads to guarantee that the charger remained in a bulk charging state. (For geeky test purposes)
Check out the below screenshot from the last week where it’s been common to get P Max numbers which far exceed 300W and even the theoretical 350W max of the panels. I stress that it’s not been particularly bright and sunny and the daily yield of 1.39kWh was never achievable prior to upgrading the MPPT well above the recommended spec from Victron.
View attachment 116743