I must admit, this doesn’t sound like any fun at all...I regularly get 40+mpg from my 204 DSG 4mot. I've done brim to brim measurements & MFD, and I find little difference between them. The main factor that seems to affect the consumption is acceleration. If I keep the top speed below 65mph & accelerate at tectonic plate speeds, I can easily get high 30's. Get it on the motorway with the ACC set to "ECO" & 60mph & I'm in the low 40's. Increase the speed to 70 & I lose 10mpg. They are extremely sensitive to a heavy right foot.
I suppose it’s down to how you define “fun”...I must admit, this doesn’t sound like any fun at all...
Fair point @Salty SpudsI suppose it’s down to how you define “fun”...
Thats true but I’ve done a few long trips without the roof bars and tube and there is hardly any difference to MPG. I have to say I am amazed that some people can get 40+ MPG. I was doing a 60 mile round trip journey for a few weeks and 75% of it was at a constant 50mph and the best I got was 36 on a tankful. I don’t consider myself having heavy left foot either. I’m seriously considering a manual for my next one. Just had a new turbo and egr fitted along with full service so will see what difference that makes.@John the Gas From the pic in your avatar I can see a roof rack and what looks like a tube carrier. That isn’t going to help the aerodynamics.
I think you’ll need to be a bit more precise when calculating fuel consumption, I don’t think the fuel gauge gives an accurate or linear scale.Afternoon all. New to the Forum as not long had my 2014 DSG 140 Caravelle. I'm interested in your thoughts. Mine doesn't have the seats in the back at the moment and on the motorway CC set at 70 after filling up gave just 90 miles and the gauge was at 3/4. Surely this can't be right, 90 mile to a quarter tank. No A/C was on or heated seats. Just driving. Thoughts please. Recently had an engine service.
I will run it down. After that 90 mile trip the van sat for 2 weeks. Just done the return journey back to work and gave approx the same. When I head home again I'll brim the tank again and see what happens.I think you’ll need to be a bit more precise when calculating fuel consumption, I don’t think the fuel gauge gives an accurate or linear scale.
Fill to brim, note milage, run tank low, fill to brim (if possible on same pump), now knowing how many litres (convert to gallons) you filled and how many miles since the previous fill you can calculate MPG.
Cheers for your reply dubber36. When I head home it will be on the same route. Not had the van long but sure its a 80 ltr tank. I'll drive down using my own foot as well see if that makes a difference. The van is empty in the back and I'm looking to convert it. So with all the extra weight in the back this will also effect consumption.Once you get over 60mph, mpg starts to plummet due to aerodynamics. Cruise control is an inefficient way of driving too. It can't anticipate up or down hills as well as you can with a gentle right foot. Assuming you have a 70litre tank, 15litres used will take the gauge down to about 3/4, (mine takes 60litres at the top of the red) that works out at 27mpg. I'd say that's about average for the conditions.
Guilty! I like nothing more than to wind the Blackberry Bomber up 2000rpm and warp factor 60, put the cruise on......put my slippers and smoking jacket on and enjoy life in the slow lane whilst sipping vpower at a very gentlemanly 50mpg.All you guys sitting at 2000rpm need to get outta the way !
My Leighton Van gets full lum every time I'm out in it at some point, should see the look on some folks faces "ooft that's a quick van"
Remap will be done in January too to help smooth out the range and torque dump at launch. 204bhp.....ha! They'll be getting swapped form Shetland ponies to Shire horses.