Hello all,
I stumbled across this site when searching if anyone else is wondering fluctuation and strangeness of T6 diesel fuel consumption.
I'm currently struggling with the issue because I also have a T6 with exceptionally high fuel consumption compared with a few other T6's, and late T5's. Besides normal diagnostics local VW service has checked a couple of traditional "hardware" things to eliminate obvious issues and all the available modifications have been implemented on the vehicle. Based on what I read in this thread it is obvious that I'm also challenged with similar problem as you Twoguns (and most likely quite many others) although I have had only once engine light on (this far) and that for different fault code. Interesting thing is that I have the same fault code "31103 - SCR NOx Catalyst Bank 1, P20EE 00 [039] - Efficiency too Low" sitting in my ECU but it hasn't turned on the light.
Currently I'm driving with a VCDS-package recording a bunch of engine parameters. And, thanks to the dealer, also verified quite a few of the measurements with their VW certified equipment. The dealer have also "offered" me (while investigating mine) opportunity to make measurements with different variants of 2.0TDI engines of T6 (and also T5's as I so requested) to verify that there are engines which work as expected, and unfortunately quite a few that do not. So, now I have been able to convince the dealer that mine and a few others up here definitely have a problem and a clear symptom and common for all of them is bad mileage. Through the dealer has been filed quite a few measurements of mine and of "good samples" for comparison and verification - the comment we received back this far was only: "interesting" (a month and a half ago).
To help sort this out, or actually just to collect "evidence", I would like ask you all who are interested to keep a diary of couple of things, and let us all know. Currently it seems that problematic vehicles have quite a fluctuation in their short period (50-150km) fuel consumption even on one continuous run. Unfortunate is that periods of good/bad mileage are relatively short - so during full tank they average out, and so the result you get is explained to be normal because of "cold weather, driving style, big car, etc."
See an example below. Even better would be if you could on your longer trip record and reset your MFD(1) mileage every 30-50 km (20-30 miles). The reason for the split is to isolate regeneration period and other ongoing "suspicious" activities. Anyways, any data is appreciated, on any engine/transmission, in any units miles/km, mpg(UK), liters/km. Also would be interesting if you could record "Oil change counter" before or after each trip. Especially interesting would be records from other engines than 110kW/150hp variants because that seems to be only way to prove that something is not right with these specific ones.
Diary:
Engine type, Power, Emission cert, Front wheel/4Motion, Manual 5 or 6 /DSG-transmission, Equipped with Webasto-engine/cabin heater.
CXFA, 110kW/150hp, EU6/SCR, 4-Motion, DSG, Webasto engine heater
Tank 1:
Distance driven/ Av. fuel cons. MFD1/ Av. speed MFD1/Outdoor temp/ Oil change counter/ load
28 miles, 55 mpg, 38mph, -5C, Oil change 8700 mi, light load <200kg, medium 500kg)
20 miles, 45 mpg, 45 mph, 0C, light load
17 miles, 35 mpg, 42 mph...
60 miles, 29 mpg, 48 mph...
etc..
About 10 runs should be sufficient to get impression of what might be going on...
Refueled XX litres, total distance driven YYY miles, Av. fuel consumption on MFD(2), Av. speed MFD(2), (then reset).
Although you might get biased I "reveal" that with "the good ones" the mileage on MFD(1) I get doing steady 70-90 kph (45-55 mph) is without any difficulties 51-56 mpg (UK gallons), outdoor temp around 0C, studded winter tyres. Of course the MFD(1) is quite optimistic but correcting the number by +9% (in my case) it matches what I get from the engine control unit and at tank fill up, too. Unfortunately it seems that MFD(2) is way more optimistic (20%) and has a lot more variation (9..32% per tank based on statistics of more than 25 fill ups). Also with "the good ones" regereration is a rare event (more than 450 km) but mine is doing about twice more often (250 km) at same conditions. With mine the mileage varies hugely 25...50mpg in same conditions (without regeneration going on).
If any of you with this variant (diesel 110kW/150hp) have a chance to run yours on dyno, I would be delighted to hear the results. Based on some preliminary "homemade" measurements I would be amazed if you would get torque/power even close to the spec. I'll definitely take mine and a "good one" to a dyno as soon as spring reaches us because the dyno won't accept studded tyres.
Thanks.
mmi
PS. I'm expecting to have ECU software updated in two weeks. The update was not yet available last Wednesday (5APR) when they changed DPF differential pressure sensor as part of latest campaign. Unfortunately that didn't change anything (has been one of recorded engine parameters so I was able to verify it right away). Anyways, my expectations are not very high based on what they announced about the update.
=================
EDITed in April-2021:
Eventually got to the bottom of the fluctuating fuel consumption.
In March 2020 finally got the long-awaited ECU (Engine Control Unit) software update. Unfortunately it took a while to get a good chance to do some measurements to try to figure out what has been changed. So finally a few weeks back dusted the VCDS and collected all kind of intriguing data. The...
www.t6forum.com