New Transporter - first official pic

Glad I'm not the only person to do this - gentle grip onto bonnet edge, hoik up on wheel. Clean windscreen, rinse and repeat on other side.
I open the door, hoik up on the step and kinda wedge myself against the front of the open door.

Yay for designs that have the ADAS Camera that needs a clear view all the time in the most sodding hard to reach place
 
I know styling is very subjective but it occurs to me one of the key things about the T5/6 designs is while they are wide and tall they do "fit" in the space of a large SUV and are one of the few medium sized vans to pull off this trick.

If the T7 is going to be Transit shape then I assume it will also share similar width and height - and that reasonably unique advantage of the Transporter that many of us rely on will be gone?

I guess we've not got to the point where dimensions are released but if it's a common platform they're not going to differ that much?
 
side view of the Transporter, which is between 5,050 mm and 5,450 mm long

I know styling is very subjective but it occurs to me one of the key things about the T5/6 designs is while they are wide and tall they do "fit" in the space of a large SUV and are one of the few medium sized vans to pull off this trick.

If the T7 is going to be Transit shape then I assume it will also share similar width and height - and that reasonably unique advantage of the Transporter that many of us rely on will be gone?

I guess we've not got to the point where dimensions are released but if it's a common platform they're not going to differ that much?

SWB 5050mm
LWB 5450mm

So about 10cm longer than the T6?

Height and width, it won't be very different from the current T6 will it?
 
The length (to some extent) doesn't bother me.

The height (car park barriers) and width (car park spaces) does - and I can't seem to find that in the T7 PR nor the Ford (at least not for the amount of searching effort I'm willing to put in!)
 
The length (to some extent) doesn't bother me.

The height (car park barriers) and width (car park spaces) does - and I can't seem to find that in the T7 PR nor the Ford (at least not for the amount of searching effort I'm willing to put in!)
Hi @roadtripper
Lounging in bath. So ‘Autotradered’ New Ford Transit;
SWB & LWB
Not checked Transporter dimensions tho!
Andy

IMG_8945.png

IMG_8946.png
 
Car are getting smaller tanks too. I reckon it's another thing to reduce the weight for emissions reasons.

I wonder how much more fuel is used pulling onto the garage forecourt, waiting for a pump with the engine idling, then getting back up to speed again more often than you'd have to with a larger tank due to more frequent fuel stops.
 
Reducing range to increase appeal of electric or hybrid?
Doubt they’re that fussed about that but manufacturers love optics/marketing so with a smaller tank, and some pie in the sky mpg figures to demonstrate it still has plenty of range, they can now boast their engineers spent time saving weight over the outgoing model and thereby improving everything but mostly mpg…
 
From a design perspective, I hope the swage line is horizontal and the side windows don't taper towards the rear - that would just be too Ford to stomach.
 
Back
Top