Like a poll maybe...?I don’t know about anyone else but this thread is boring the shit out of me now.
A simple yes or no would of been sufficient
Like a poll maybe...?I don’t know about anyone else but this thread is boring the shit out of me now.
A simple yes or no would of been sufficient
We have a ID 4 and a ID 3 and a beflingo and an electric transporter lwb.kombi I didn’t want any of them as I have a perfectly working T5 and T6 there . They do get used but and are ok. But as a few other guys it’s the infrastructure and range of the vans. But the vans won’t be staying.Does anyone really believe that electric vehicles are the way forward?
As it stands you couldn’t give me one for free. Let alone fork out £40k+ for one.
Apparently there’s only a handful of companies in the UK will insure them.
They are also the reason everyone’s insurance has gone through the roof.
They like to go on fire and the slightest bump they are written off as they can’t guarantee the battery is safe after.
Thats all on top of the infrastructure simply not being in place to make them viable.
The fact the mining for the rare materials used in their construction makes their carbon footprints larger than our dirty diesel vans just seems to be lost on the woke brigade buying them.
The funny thing is. I never even started this thread.I don’t know about anyone else but this thread is boring the shit out of me now.
A simple yes or no would of been sufficient
EVs do not like lots of starts and short trips..
Yes exactly peoples opinions and seems if you say not for me or not to sure just yet you get jumped upon by the so say planet savers.it's a great discussion, and it's good to hear different peoples thoughts and opinions on the subject.
but, as seems the way in society at the moment, the most vocal people get very defensive and polarised while the majority sit somewhere in the middle...
ExactlyLike a poll maybe...?
Just because that's the conditions we've been operating them in, and more than one EV can't seem to hack it. Dead in a few months. I accept lots of starts and short trips might not be the root cause, but it seems that way.Really? How did you come to that conclusion ?
I wondered the same. Express Dairys & The Coop didn’t seem to have a problemReally? How did you come to that conclusion ?
I just did the same google and AI (the first hit) says 100 million lines for a car and 8 million for an F35! Utter bullocks! It’s simply not comparing apples with apples. What is included in the assessment - it certainly isn’t the whole aircraft as a system. The only other explanation (or addition to lack of apples!) would be bloatware, different (inefficient) software, lesser investment and less worries about efficiency in the automotive field. Or they are just very, very bad at coding!! Which is worrying as aviation aren’t fantastic!@ginkster I just used a simple Google search “lines of computer code in car controls”. Maybe you disagree, but when I worked in Ricardo PLC our Centenary Lecture also made such a statement although back then in 2015 it was just 10 million lines! The aircraft comparison excluded passenger entertainment systems.
I'm not sure # lines of code is a straightforward (or even a useful) metric when assessing relative system complexities. In fact, unless you're comparing homogenous coding languages with consistently applied beautification rules across those code bases, it can be pretty misleading. You could try instruction counting at an assembler or machine code level - this might provide a better indication of complexity, but this will likely be highly hardware dependent, so unlikely to be comparable.I just did the same google and AI (the first hit) says 100 million lines for a car and 8 million for an F35! Utter bullocks! It’s simply not comparing apples with apples. What is included in the assessment - it certainly isn’t the whole aircraft as a system. The only other explanation (or addition to lack of apples!) would be bloatware, different (inefficient) software, lesser investment and less worries about efficiency in the automotive field. Or they are just very, very bad at coding!! Which is worrying as aviation aren’t fantastic!
I nearly spewed my coffee over my keyboard at this one....!!!!
You clearly haven't been to central London in the last 15 years!!!
The place is still a gridlocked hellhole, I can assure you. (worse than 15 years ago if you ask me)
Walk, cycle, take the bus, the train. Basically don't jump in the van for a 2 minute drive to the paper shop. It's not much, but it's a start, and these small steps can make a massive difference if enough of us act on them.but what's the realistic alternative here.
EVERYONE on this thread has said there isn't one yet...
so what do you (or anyone else) suggest?
Thanks, interesting. It would be interesting to know the System Integrity Levels for the various functions. That would add a different slant on the comparison.I just did the same google and AI (the first hit) says 100 million lines for a car and 8 million for an F35! Utter bullocks! It’s simply not comparing apples with apples. What is included in the assessment - it certainly isn’t the whole aircraft as a system. The only other explanation (or addition to lack of apples!) would be bloatware, different (inefficient) software, lesser investment and less worries about efficiency in the automotive field. Or they are just very, very bad at coding!! Which is worrying as aviation aren’t fantastic!
absolutely agree.Walk, cycle, take the bus, the train. Basically don't jump in the van for a 2 minute drive to the paper shop. It's not much, but it's a start, and these small steps can make a massive difference if enough of us act on them.